FAQ: Trump Administration's Plan to Revoke Ocean City Wind Farm Approval

Summary
What is the main topic of this article?
The Trump administration’s plan to revoke the federal construction and operations permit for US Wind’s proposed wind farm off the coast of Ocean City, Maryland.
Why is the Trump administration revoking the wind farm approval?
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is ‘in the process of reconsidering its prior approval’ for the wind project, though specific reasons for the reconsideration are not detailed in the content.
Who is involved in this situation?
The Trump administration and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (revoking approval), US Wind (project developer), Ocean City (which sued to block the project), and the U.S. District Court of Maryland (where the case is filed).
When was the wind farm originally approved and when might it be revoked?
The permit was issued in December 2024 near the end of President Biden’s administration, and the government intends to move to vacate the approval no later than September 12, 2025.
Where is the proposed wind farm located?
Off the coast of Ocean City, Maryland, in federal waters managed by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
How does US Wind respond to the revocation attempt?
US Wind believes its 2024 federal permit remains valid and legally sound, stating it was secured after a multi-year rigorous public review process, and is fighting to keep the approval in place.
What legal action has been taken regarding this wind farm?
Ocean City sued the federal government last year to block the wind farm, and the recent revocation proposal was filed jointly with Ocean City in the U.S. District Court of Maryland.
What is the significance of revoking the construction and operations plan permit?
Revoking this key federal permit would effectively block the development of the offshore wind farm, despite it having previously received full federal approval after extensive review.

This story is based on an article that was registered on the blockchain. The original source content used for this article is located at citybiz
Article Control ID: 180470